Morocco’s high-profile narcotics investigation escalated this week after a state prosecutor directly connected former minister Mohamed Najib Boulif popularly known as Naciri in political circles to a notorious international drug trafficker known as Desert Escobar. This revelation has pushed the already tense case into a new phase, drawing intense public attention and renewed scrutiny over organized crime networks in North Africa.
Growing Evidence Alleged Ties Between Naciri and Desert Escobar
According to the prosecution, recently uncovered evidence shows financial trails, communication patterns, and alleged facilitation activities linking Naciri to the drug kingpin. Authorities believe Desert Escobar controls a sprawling narcotics route that stretches across the Sahel, the Sahara, and several Mediterranean gateways.
Investigators say these operations move large quantities of hashish and cocaine through complex smuggling networks. As the inquiry widens, officials have traced several transactions and logistical assists to individuals close to Naciri. This connection has intensified speculation about political shielding and long-standing corruption vulnerabilities.
Courtroom Developments Adding Pressure on Morocco’s Political Establishment
During the latest hearing, the prosecutor detailed how Naciri allegedly provided influence and protection that enabled Desert Escobar’s network to expand. While Naciri strongly denies every accusation, the mounting documentation has placed him under immense pressure.
Moreover, the case has stirred debates over accountability within Morocco’s political system. Many citizens believe the investigation marks a rare moment where powerful figures face real consequences. Others argue that the case exposes deeper structural issues that require reform, especially regarding border surveillance and financial transparency.
Public Reaction Reflecting Deep Frustration With Crime and Corruption
Social media platforms exploded with commentary soon after the prosecution’s statement. Many Moroccans expressed frustration, saying the revelations confirm long-held suspicions about political interference in criminal enterprises. At the same time, rights advocates pushed for a fair trial and cautioned against public judgment before the court reaches its final decision.
Prosecutor Demands İmamoglu’s 2,430-Year Sentence, Party Dissolution